In 1 Kings 9:10-12, we find a fascinating episode in the life of Solomon, a man renowned for his wisdom and his covenant with God. The passage tells us: “At the end of the twenty years during which Solomon had built these two houses—the house of the LORD and the royal palace—King Solomon gave twenty cities in the land of Galilee to Hiram king of Tyre, as Hiram had supplied him with cedar, cypress, and gold for his every desire. So Hiram went out from Tyre to look over the cities Solomon had given him, but they did not please him” (1 Kings 9:10-12, BSB).

The cities Solomon offered to Hiram, though perhaps strategically located, fell short of his expectations. Hiram, who had invested heavily in Solomon’s grand building projects, was displeased with what he received in return. What appeared to Solomon as a reasonable gift was perceived by Hiram as inadequate, leading to disappointment.

This encounter reminds us of an interesting tension between human expectations and divine realities.

While Solomon gave out of his abundance, Hiram’s response suggests a gap between what was offered and what was desired. The same dynamic appears in John 7:41, where people are wrestling with expectations about the Messiah: “Others declared, ‘This is the Christ.’ But still others asked, ‘How can the Christ come from Galilee?’” (John 7:41, BSB).

The reference to Galilee becomes a stumbling block for some

Their expectations of the Messiah were shaped by preconceived notions of what God’s deliverance should look like. In their minds, nothing good could come from a region as insignificant as Galilee, much less the Christ Himself. But this was not an oversight in God’s plan—it was part of His sovereign purpose to display His wisdom through what seemed foolish to human eyes.

The two passages are deeply connected by this theme of expectation versus reality. Hiram looked at the cities of Galilee and was displeased; those in John’s Gospel looked at the region of Galilee and dismissed it. In both cases, God’s purposes were at work in ways that confounded human understanding. For Solomon, the cities of Galilee may have represented a minor detail in his grand kingdom, but they held a greater significance as part of the Promised Land, given by God to Israel. For Jesus, coming from Galilee symbolized the humility of His incarnation, where He chose to identify with the lowly rather than the exalted.

How often do we, like Hiram or the skeptical crowd, judge things by appearance and fail to grasp the deeper work of God? Hiram saw the cities as unworthy of his investment, while others saw Galilee as unworthy of the Messiah. Yet, in both cases, God’s hand was working through the very things that seemed insignificant.

As we reflect on these passages, it’s worth asking: How often do we bring our expectations before God, only to find that He is working in ways we don’t fully understand? When we’re tempted to dismiss something—or someone—because it doesn’t meet our criteria, are we willing to pause and consider that God’s wisdom is greater than ours?

1 Corinthians 1:27 echoes this truth: “But God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong” (BSB). What appeared insignificant to Hiram and offensive to skeptics in Jesus’ day was part of God’s redemptive plan to display His glory. May we learn to trust Him, even when His ways do not align with our expectations.

How does God challenge your understanding of His purposes today?

For further reflection, consider Isaiah 55:8-9 and Micah 5:2.

---